View Project

G2S Project Code: 2020-RI-86352
State: Rhode Island
Fiscal Year: 2020
Grantee
Rhode Island Office of Library and Information Services

Project Director
Director Name: Jason Ackermann
Director Phone: 401-574-9317
Director Email: jason.ackermann@olis.ri.gov
General Information
Title: Preservation and Digitization
State Project Code:
Start Date: 10/01/2019
End Date: 09/30/2021
Abstract: The Office of Library and Information Services (OLIS) supports digitization efforts and provides preservation resources and referral services for libraries and other cultural heritage organizations statewide. Online services include dPlan-RI and an online directory of preservation and disaster response resources.   OLIS awarded a series of grants to libraries across Rhode Island to aid in developing and augmenting digital collections to promote preservation and access to unique, local collections. Digitization grants supported libraries that would otherwise have limited access to funding and increases the number and diversity of digital collections while developing expertise at Rhode Island institutions to establish the basis for a robust statewide Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) hub. 
State Goal: Access
Budget Information
LSTA
MATCH-State
MATCH-Other
Total
$173,533.82
$4,553.02
$35,969.20
$214,056.04
Intent(s)
Improve library operations.
Disaster Preparedness
Outreach & Partnerships
Activities
Activity Details
Title: Disaster Planning and Response
Narrative:
Preservation planning and disaster planning are statutory requirements for RI public libraries. To facilitate compliance with state law, OLIS requires every public library to use dPlan-RI to create and maintain a disaster and preservation plan for each library building in its system. dPlan-RI is an online preservation and disaster planning template customized with resources for RI libraries. Public libraries’ plans are monitored by OLIS annually. 

OLIS staff developed a new method to better provide libraries with finished paper copies of their disaster plans for use in case of emergencies.  This method augments the existing functionality of dPlan and improves on previous methods of document creation in both production time and quality.  

Concurrently, OLIS staff started researching alternatives to the current dPlan platform because of longstanding issues relating to background site maintenance and general updates.  Although the current format of the site is meeting end-user needs, increasingly unreliable server uptime and the application approaching end of life status has made it more urgent to find a next-generation alternative to dPlan.  OLIS is engaged in ongoing discussions with the Northeast Document Conservation Center (NEDCC), the current dPlan-RI provider, to identify a more robust solution.  


Intent: Improve library operations.

Activity: Planning & Evaluation
Mode: Prospective
Format: Third party


Quantity
Number of evaluations and/or plans funded: 71
Number of funded evaluation and/or plans completed: 71


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: Yes
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 71
Academic Libraries: 1
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 1
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Question 1: I believe the planning and evaluation addresses library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I am satisfied with the extent to which the plan or evaluation addresses library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I believe the information from the plan or evaluation will be applied to address library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Special Collections Roundtable
Narrative: OLIS staff organized one general planning meeting and three informational Continuing Education sessions as part of its Special Collections Roundtable. Session topics included: basics of genealogy for hobby genealogists with the RI Historical Society and Providence Public Library; moving collections during a library renovation with the Providence Public Library; and constructing and sharing digital finding aids in museums and archives to assist in collection discovery and to move toward a more unified format for finding aides by using Encoded Archival Description (EAD) with RI Archival and Manuscript Collection Online (RIAMCO). These events further OLIS’s goal to promote and develop a cohesive, knowledgeable, grass roots community of digitization and special collections efforts. 
Intent: Improve library operations.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Program
Format: Virtual


Quantity
Session length (minutes): 60
Number of sessions in program: 4
Average number in attendance per session: 8
Number of times program administered: 1


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: Yes
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 22
Academic Libraries: 5
SLAA: 1
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 3
School Libraries: 0
Other: 2
Question 1: I learned something by participating in this library activity.
Strongly Agree: 5
Agree: 1
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 1
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I feel more confident about what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 2
Agree: 4
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 1
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I intend to apply what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 4
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 2
Strongly Disagree: 1
Non-Response: 0
Question 4: Applying what I learned will help improve library services to the public.
Strongly Agree: 4
Agree: 1
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 1
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 1
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Rhode Island Public Laws Digitization Project
Narrative: The Rhode Island State Library, the state’s legislative library, digitized five years of the Rhode Island Public Laws, Acts, and Resolves, the library’s most used collection, and added them to the library’s online catalog in a separate database for users.  The target audience are the library’s current users of this collection, which include state employees, attorneys, and the public.   The project will also make work in the Law Revision office more efficient and will support the work of the RI General Assembly.
Intent: Improve library operations.

Activity: Content
Mode: Creation
Format: Digital


Quantity
Number of items digitized: 3,263
Number of items digitized and available to the public: 3,263
Number of physical items: 0
Number of open-source applications/software/systems: 0
Number of proprietary applications/software/systems: 0
Number of learning resources (e.g. toolkits, guides): 0
Number of plans/frameworks: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: Yes
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: Rhode Island State Library
Address: Rhode Island State House
City: Providence
State: RI
Zip: 02903

Activity Details
Title: RI School of Design Archives Magnetic Media at Risk
Narrative:
The Fleet Library at the RI School of Design (RISD) digitized 298 tapes from the library’s archive of over 2,000 videos in various magnetic tape formats, such as betamax, U-matic, and VHS, that captured events held at RISD in the 1980s and 1990s. The tapes documented the college’s Universal Kitchen project in the 1990s, which had a major impact on subsequent accessibility and universal design developments. Other tapes contained lectures by major artists, designers, and cultural figures, including Maya Angelou, Dore Ashton, Carlos Fuentes, and Allen Ginsburg. These recordings were in a state of decay and at risk of being lost if not transferred to a preservable media. The contents of the tapes are of interest to art and design faculty and students, art historians, curators, scholars, and the general public.

The recordings are historically significant to those interested in arts and culture in the U.S. in the 1980s and 1990s, including disability studies scholars, historians of art, architecture and design education, and biographers of the artists and scholars whose presentations were documented. Much of the digitized content is freely available to anyone with computer and internet access. Presently, the project has primarily benefited internal RISD audiences and has received positive initial feedback. 

Intent: Improve library operations.

Activity: Content
Mode: Creation
Format: Digital


Quantity
Number of items digitized: 298
Number of items digitized and available to the public: 298
Number of physical items: 0
Number of open-source applications/software/systems: 0
Number of proprietary applications/software/systems: 0
Number of learning resources (e.g. toolkits, guides): 0
Number of plans/frameworks: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: Yes
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: Rhode Island School of Design
Address: 2 College St
City: Providence
State: RI
Zip: 02903-2784

Activity Details
Title: Rhode Island Historical Society: Digital Library of RI History
Narrative: This pilot project created a freely available web-based, searchable database of bibliographic citations on works listed in the Standard Bibliography of Rhode Island History.  This work is the most comprehensive bibliography of historical works about Rhode Island and is out of print and scarce. This project made over 1,000 entries from that work more accessible, not only to the library community, but to educators and their students, to history and heritage organizations in the state, and to the general public. This pilot project established the structure upon which to build and expand a sustainable, free, and widely accessible public information resource. In its current phase the development work itself has benefitted a range of participants, among them high school seniors, college students, professors, staff from other history and heritage organizations, and RIHS staff.  
Intent: Improve library operations.

Activity: Content
Mode: Description
Format: Digital


Quantity
Number of items made discoverable to the public: 1,175
Number of collections made discoverable to the public: 0
Number of metadata plans/frameworks produced/updated: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: Yes
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: Rhode Island Historical Society
Address: 110 Benevolent Street
City: Providence
State: RI
Zip: 02906

Activity Details
Title: Narragansett Times Newspaper Digitization
Narrative:
The South Kingstown Public Library (SKPL) digitized several years of the Narragansett Times newspaper to increase findability and access to a significant historical resource for South Kingstown and southern Rhode Island. This also resulted in the preservation of a heavily used local history resource that the library holds, as well as the ability to have simultaneous users through a digital platform instead of the single use of the library’s microfilm holdings. 

Project beneficiaries include adults and seniors, specifically researchers and genealogists that have often used the library’s in-house materials for research. Staff also benefited by being able to easily find answers to reference requests. As a result of the project and activities, the SKPL website saw increases in website traffic.  Website analytics from August thru September 30 reported 22,615 views by 613 users (595 new). One unexpected benefit of this project has been a better understanding of website usage and Google Analytics among the library staff. 


Intent: Improve library operations.

Activity: Content
Mode: Creation
Format: Digital


Quantity
Number of items digitized: 70
Number of items digitized and available to the public: 70
Number of physical items: 0
Number of open-source applications/software/systems: 0
Number of proprietary applications/software/systems: 0
Number of learning resources (e.g. toolkits, guides): 0
Number of plans/frameworks: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: Yes
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: SOUTH KINGSTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY
Address: 1057 KINGSTOWN ROAD
City: SOUTH KINGSTOWN
State: RI
Zip: 02879

Activity Details
Title: Woonsocket Call Newspaper Digitization
Narrative:
The Woonsocket Harris Public Library digitized 60 years of the Woonsocket Call newspaper in a format that is text searchable. The project sought to preserve historical content, for ease of search and discovery of information, and to provide more efficient public service and workflow. The reference department receives inquiries from people worldwide seeking articles from the newspaper, particularly for content from the early twentieth century and war years, which was previously unavailable online. Due to a shortage of library staff, research was completed when time permitted, leaving requests on hold. The staff experienced an increase of requests during the pandemic from people interested in researching their family history. Online access of this newspaper for the public enhances services greatly, frees up staff time for completion of other projects, preserves the community’s written history, and offers people the opportunity to complete research at their leisure.

The project has made a valuable resource available to the community. The website went live in September 2021 and received 294 hits on that day. Early results indicate that the project will be valuable and viable in the future as the website continues to be utilized, extending the value of the project indefinitely and substantially expanding access to the resource. The library also noted that replacing the manual process of loading and searching for microfilm articles with an online OCR search tool helps improve search results. 


Intent: Improve library operations.

Activity: Content
Mode: Creation
Format: Digital


Quantity
Number of items digitized: 310
Number of items digitized and available to the public: 310
Number of physical items: 0
Number of open-source applications/software/systems: 0
Number of proprietary applications/software/systems: 0
Number of learning resources (e.g. toolkits, guides): 0
Number of plans/frameworks: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: WOONSOCKET HARRIS PUBLIC LIBRARY
Address: 303 CLINTON STREET
City: WOONSOCKET
State: RI
Zip: 02895
Project Outcomes
Project Outcomes
List any important outcomes or findings not previously reported:
100% of Rhode Island public libraries have detailed plans that prepare them to respond to disasters that may affect their buildings and collections. The past year has demonstrated the need to add response to a public health crisis as part of disaster preparedness. Digitization subgrant projects helped to develop digital collections of uniquely Rhode Island material and increase their discoverability. This opportunity to experiment and develop otherwise cost-prohibitive online spaces and the experience gained while planning such projects further serves to grow the expertise and experience of Rhode Island librarians.
Please briefly describe the importance of these outcomes and findings for future program planning:
Increased collection access, discoverability, and an ability to match patrons with relevant resources connected to their community and professional interests are universal short-term outcomes for the public, while the individual experience gained by library staff working on specific digitization projects has the greatest long-term impact on the viability and proliferation of digital collections in the state’s libraries.
Explain one or two of the most significant lessons learned for others wanting to adopt any facets of this project:

Do you anticipate continuing this project after the current reporting period ends:
Yes
Do you anticipate any change in level of effort in managing this project:
No
Explain:

Do you anticipate changing the types of activities and objectives addressed by the project:
No
Explain:

Was an evaluation conducted for this project:
No
Was a final written evaluation report produced:
No
Can the final written evaluation report be shared publicly on the IMLS website:
No
Was the evaluation conducted by project staff (either SLAA or local library) or by a third-party evaluator:
Third-Party
What data collection tools were used for any report outcomes and outputs:
Did you collect any media for the data:
What types of methods were used to analyze collected data:
Other:
How were participants (or items) selected:
What type of research design did you use to compare the value for any reported output or outcome:
Exemplary: Yes
Exemplary Narrative
Project Tags: digitization, digitization, special collections