View Project

G2S Project Code: 2020-AR-85641
State: Arkansas
Fiscal Year: 2020
Grantee
Arkansas State Library

Project Director
Director Name: Karen O'Connell
Director Phone: 501-682-2874
Director Email: karen.oconnell@ade.arkansas.gov
General Information
Title: Arkansas Center for the Book
State Project Code: 02
Start Date: 10/01/2020
End Date: 09/30/2021
Abstract: As the COVID-19 pandemic persisted this year, the Arkansas Center for the Book continued to adjust programming, especially in regards to virtual activities. Book Clubs had mixed attendance, with some persevering with online and in-person meetings; others had difficulty regaining momentum after hiatus. Early in the year, it was decided to continue with a virtual implementation for the project’s one book/community read activity, If All Arkansas Read the Same Book. The reduced speaker fee allowed the Center to redirect funding toward supporting The Mosaic Templars Cultural Center's in-person event with Candacy Taylor, author of The Overground Railroad and curator of “The Negro Motorists Green Book” Smithsonian traveling exhibition. Lastly, the Center held a tremendously successful online poetry program, featuring Jo McDougall, the Poet Laureate of Arkansas, and Pulitzer Prize winner Jericho Brown. Exciting programming opportunities and the dedicated persistence of Arkansas readers have inspired the Center this year, confirming that the value of the written word continues to impact our society both globally and locally.
State Goal: Enhance Access to Information for Lifelong Learning
Budget Information
LSTA
MATCH-State
MATCH-Other
Total
$52,563.00
$86,302.00
$23,221.00
$162,086.00
Intent(s)
Improve users' general knowledge and skills.
Arts, Culture & Humanities
Activities
Activity Details
Title: Arkansas Gems
Narrative:

Arkansas Gems connects adults and students in the state to current activities in literature through the creation and distribution of posters and bookmarks featuring a selection of newly published works about Arkansas subjects or by authors from Arkansas. The pandemic influenced the design choice again this fiscal year, as many people in Arkansas enjoyed experiencing nature and the outdoors. In addition, the Center chose 21 Gems for 2021. Although the National Book Festival was again virtual this year, there were no virtual booths for State Center Affiliates. Instead, the Center debuted the design at the virtual Arkansas Library Association Conference. Posters were sent to all Arkansas public libraries as well as middle and high schools in the state this year. 



Intent: Improve users' general knowledge and skills.

Activity: Content
Mode: Creation
Format: Combined physical & digital


Quantity
Number of items digitized: 2
Number of items digitized and available to the public: 2
Number of physical items: 13,200
Number of open-source applications/software/systems: 0
Number of proprietary applications/software/systems: 0
Number of learning resources (e.g. toolkits, guides): 0
Number of plans/frameworks: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 220
Academic Libraries: 2
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 800
Other: 40

Activity Details
Title: Book Club Lending
Narrative:

The pandemic continued to affect book clubs in Arkansas, with attendance levels and book circulation down overall throughout the state; as many clubs struggled to find safe ways to meet for discussions. The Coordinator met virtually with book club coordinators quarterly, with feedback that many readers preferred in-person meetings; and two book clubs chose to discontinue this year because of the pandemic. With vaccine deployment, numbers increased; however, the Delta variant caused another drop later in the fiscal year. Nevertheless, many clubs persevered; including new clubs at Gravette Public Library and Montgomery County Library, as well as a library/community business collaboration between Eureka Springs Carnegie Library and Gotahold Brewing, a local coffee shop and brewery. This reporting year, 453 book club kits were shipped, which is up 13% from last year; and there were 2,639 reported readers, which is down by 4%.


Intent: Improve users' general knowledge and skills.

Activity: Content
Mode: Lending
Format: Physical


Quantity
Total number of items circulated: 5,436
Average number of items circulated / month: 453
Total number of ILL transactions: 0
Average number of ILL transactions / month: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 45
Academic Libraries: 1
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 3
Other: 1

Activity Details
Title: If All Arkansas Read the Same Book
Narrative:

The Center planned an online presentation of our community-read activity (If All Arkansas Read the Same Book) due to unknown circumstances related to gathering sizes and safety. Fiona Davis’ novel, The Lions of Fifth Avenue was chosen; as an escapist read as well as a means to acknowledge the significance of the history of women’s suffrage in the United States. Two live virtual events were held: one a traditional author talk on June 10; the second a book-club format discussion held on July 27 that allowed readers a deeper dive into the themes and characters in the novel. Physical copies of the novel were sent to all public libraries in the state and multiple eBook and audiobook copies were both licensed and purchased for statewide Overdrive consortia. Both programs were over Zoom and simultaneously livestreamed over YouTube, and there were 313 attendees total for both programs. Lastly, the reduced speaker fee allowed the Center to redirect funds to collaborate with the Mosaic Templars Cultural Center on the opening of their installation of the Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition, “The Negro Motorist Green Book.” 


Intent: Improve users' general knowledge and skills.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Presentation/performance
Format: Virtual


Quantity
Presentation/performance length (minutes): 75
Number of presentations/performances administered: 2
Average number in attendance per session: 157


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 220
Academic Libraries: 2
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 1
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0

Activity Details
Title: Collaborations
Narrative:

Since the Library of Congress concluded the Letters About Literature activity in 2019, the Arkansas Center for the Book will work on collaborations that concentrate on aspects of reading that are not as strongly addressed in other Arkansas Center for the Book activities; namely, Poetry, Illustration, and the Book Arts. In this reporting year, the Center collaborated with the Poet Laureate of Arkansas, Jo McDougall, on a highly successful poetry program; “In Conversation with Jericho Brown.” The live virtual program took place on February 4thand was a combination poetry reading and conversation with Jericho Brown on his Pulitzer-Prize winning collection, The Tradition. Dr. Brown and Jo McDougall as well as Arkansas poet Kai Coggin discussed the writing of particular poems and methods for teaching young poets. Lastly, four Arkansas high school students from rural and urban/suburban areas asked Dr. Brown questions about writing. The program was held over Zoom Webinar, simultaneously livestreamed over YouTube, and there were 328 advance RSVPs and 263 in attendance. The virtual nature of the program brought attendees from 37 states and five countries other than the USA.



Intent: Improve users' general knowledge and skills.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Presentation/performance
Format: Virtual


Quantity
Presentation/performance length (minutes): 60
Number of presentations/performances administered: 1
Average number in attendance per session: 263


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 220
Academic Libraries: 1
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 1
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Project Outcomes
Project Outcomes
List any important outcomes or findings not previously reported:
As with last year, virtual implementations allowed for more statewide access to a given event; however, it is difficult to gauge reach when activities are interdependent on technology and connectivity at the user’s end; and particularly when public gathering sizes are limited.
Please briefly describe the importance of these outcomes and findings for future program planning:
Based on lessons learned from last reporting year, the Center used different technology for virtual programming, which allowed for a more streamlined end-user experience.
Explain one or two of the most significant lessons learned for others wanting to adopt any facets of this project:
Reduced speaker fees due to virtual programming were again leveraged for community impact, especially this year in furthering our collaboration with the Mosaic Templars Cultural Center.
Do you anticipate continuing this project after the current reporting period ends:
Yes
Do you anticipate any change in level of effort in managing this project:
No
Explain:

Do you anticipate changing the types of activities and objectives addressed by the project:
No
Explain:

Was an evaluation conducted for this project:
No
Was a final written evaluation report produced:
No
Can the final written evaluation report be shared publicly on the IMLS website:
No
Was the evaluation conducted by project staff (either SLAA or local library) or by a third-party evaluator:
Third-Party
What data collection tools were used for any report outcomes and outputs:
Did you collect any media for the data:
What types of methods were used to analyze collected data:
Other:
How were participants (or items) selected:
What type of research design did you use to compare the value for any reported output or outcome:
Exemplary: No
Exemplary Narrative
Project Tags: