Project Outcomes
Project Outcomes
List any important outcomes or findings not previously reported:
Alt HealthWatch (Sessions: 836,324; Searches: 1,099,561; Total Requests: 3,185,515; Full-Text Requests: 934,871) showed promising growth in the first half of the fiscal year with increases in use across the board from sessions to requests. It saw a 45% fall in sessions during the second half of the year, but decreases in requests were modest at -10% or less, and usage is still high overall.
The first half of the fiscal year saw modest drops in Business Source Elite (Sessions: 466,752; Searches: 705,536; Total Requests: 71,189; Full-Text Requests: 28,687) across the board with a modest gain in the number of full-text requests. The spring saw significant declines in sessions and searches of over 50%, with smaller drops in requests. Overall, usage is still reasonably high, and the pandemic closures likely caused the spring drop in usage.
Overall usage of Consumer Health Complete (Sessions: 5,967; Searches: 7,713; Total Requests: 8,802; Full-Text Requests: 5,762) is light but consistent with several hundred searches and requests per month, with some months rising over 1,000 inquiries and requests. The first half of the fiscal year saw modest drops, most under 10%, with more significant reductions in the spring of more than 30%. On the one hand, declines in the usage of a health database are surprising given that statewide closures were for a global pandemic. On the other, state medical facilities were primarily closed to elective procedures for weeks, and most had to be rescheduled after opening.
Despite a 29% drop in database sessions from last fiscal year, Health Source Consumer Edition (Sessions: 678,770; Searches: 1,005,718; Total Requests: 2,083,636; Full-Text Requests: 860,574)usage remained high at more than 675,000 sessions. Again, the fall session count was more in line with what we saw in the prior fiscal year. The drop came in the spring, along with the password issues and pandemic-related closures. We saw a significant increase in requests during the first half of the year, and requests did not drop much despite the meaningful drop-in sessions and searches, indicating that we have some power users.
Usage of Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition (Sessions: 676,157; Searches: 1,001,993; Total Requests: 2,210,144; Full-Text Requests: 773,331)remained high in numbers comparable to Health Source: Consumer Edition, but they still fell significantly across the board except for Full-Text Requests, which rose 19% in Fall 2019 before dropping 20% in Spring 2020. It may be worthwhile to survey library staff and users to ensure this resource is still meeting their needs and ensuring there are no technical issues beyond the spring password change.
Despite a 67% increase in Fall 2019 sessions, the session count for Legal Information Reference Center (Sessions: 29,133; Searches: 88,061; Total Requests: 897; Full-Text Requests: 475) dropped 40% in the spring. The drop is possibly due to a combination of pandemic-related closures and new password issues. Full-text requests increased dramatically. However, this database’s more interesting comparison is the high number of sessions and searches (29,133 and 88,061 respectively in 2019-20) with the comparatively low number of requests (897 total in 2019-20) despite the print popularity of the Nolo book titles this database contains. This small number confirms something we have suspected in creating tutorials for this database: it is challenging to use. It is not clear from the marketing that users will find Nolo titles here. eBook chapters are navigated, displayed, and searched like academic journal articles, which is confusing for most non-academic users who want to page through the book or find a legal form.
MasterFile Premier (Sessions: 656,451; Searches: 937,979; Total Requests: 2,869,655; Full-Text Requests: 1,218,392)usage remains very high with nearly a million searches and more than 650,000 sessions in 2019-20, and this is still a roughly 30% drop from the prior fiscal year. Even with minimal Spring 2020 declines, total requests were still up 12% for the fiscal year.
The Newspaper Source (Sessions: 670,070; Searches: 983,874; Total Requests: 2,924,756; Full-Text Requests: 1,420,810)database is understandably very popular since it contains the state capital newspaper, The Charleston Gazette. Despite a Spring 2020 drop across the board, usage remains very high, with more than 670,000 sessions and 2,924,756 requests. Fall 2019 even showed a 41% increase in requests.
NoveList Plus (Sessions: 229,190; Searches: 243,772; Total Requests: 1,307,319; Full-Text Requests: 5) continues to be a liked database with more than 200,000 sessions and searches in 2019-20. Requests rose significantly in Fall 2019 and suffered a minimal drop in Spring 2020.
Points of View Reference Center (Sessions: 420,852; Searches: 654,149; Total Requests: 75,452; Full-Text Requests: 45,108) is aimed mostly at students completing projects on current events, and social issues saw a substantial decrease in usage for the fiscal year. The 63% drop in sessions for Spring 2020 was not unexpected, given pandemic-related school closures and statewide connectivity issues. Still, it also saw smaller declines in sessions and usage in the fall. Usage remains high with over 400,000 sessions during the fiscal year, so this is a tool that’s still seeing use, but the low number of requests (75,452) relative to sessions is concerning. Declines in usage may, however, be because of how this database presents information. It has a significantly different design from most other EBSCO resources. It’s not clear at what point the info presented in Points of View Reference Center counts as a request. EBSCO documentation does not seem to be granular enough to specify this for this database.
A severe drop in usage for Primary Search (Sessions: 270,566; Searches: 399,415; Total Requests: 603,556; Full-Text Requests: 282,609) was seen in both halves of the fiscal year. The Spring 2020 drops were not entirely unexpected due to pandemic-related school closures, but this database suffered a decline of nearly half of its usage in Fall 2019. Having heard no commentary or complaints from its intended users, we must determine whether technical issues, quality issues, lack of connectivity, or lack of awareness are causing the drop. At more than 270,000 sessions for the fiscal year, its usage is still substantial, but with a decline this severe, we should investigate the reasons and consider alternatives.
Usage of Regional Business News (Sessions: 667,524; Searches: 972,491; Total Requests: 2,812,460; Full-Text Requests: 1,352,841) was held reasonably steady in the first half of the fiscal year, and requests increased by 47%. Then sessions and searches dropped by roughly half in Spring 2020, most likely due to pandemic-related school and business closures. Otherwise, usage remained high, with 667,524 sessions for the fiscal year and nearly three million requests. As with other databases that suffered a substantial drop, we should survey librarians and users to determine any new technical or quality issues.
Sessions for World Book Online (Sessions: 37,747; Searches per session: 10.8; Content views: 165,570) fell slightly during the fiscal year’s halves but much less than expected in Spring 2020 due to significant increases during the month’s pre-pandemic closures. Session counts in January 2020 increased by 85%, and session counts in February 2020 increased by 223%. Then the schools closed. Sessions dropped 93% in April 2020 and 96% in May 2020 from those same months in 2019. Search and content views per session metrics indicate that users succeed at least somewhat in finding sufficient resources on each visit. However, overall, usage remains lower than it probably could be, especially compared to higher session counts in other similar resources. There are opportunities for growth, especially given some of the newer products included in our World Book subscription.
Please briefly describe the importance of these outcomes and findings for future program planning:
The Library Commission plans to use the data collected this and next fiscal year to decide which databases no longer meet the citizens' needs and explore potential new resources to make available.
Explain one or two of the most significant lessons learned for others wanting to adopt any facets of this project:
Do you anticipate continuing this project after the current reporting period ends:
Yes
Do you anticipate any change in level of effort in managing this project:
No
Explain:
Do you anticipate changing the types of activities and objectives addressed by the project:
No
Explain:
Was an evaluation conducted for this project:
No
Was a final written evaluation report produced:
No
Can the final written evaluation report be shared publicly on the IMLS website:
No
Was the evaluation conducted by project staff (either SLAA or local library) or by a third-party evaluator:
Third-Party
What data collection tools were used for any report outcomes and outputs:
Did you collect any media for the data:
What types of methods were used to analyze collected data:
Other:
How were participants (or items) selected:
What type of research design did you use to compare the value for any reported output or outcome: