View Project

G2S Project Code: 2019-MN-83743
State: Minnesota
Fiscal Year: 2019
Grantee
SAINT PAUL PUBLIC LIBRARY

Project Director
Director Name: Beth Burns
Director Phone: 651-222-3242
Director Email: beth@thefriends.org
General Information
Title: Sustain, Grow and Evaluate Community-Informed Programming at the Saint Paul Public Library
State Project Code:
Start Date: 07/01/2019
End Date: 09/30/2020
Abstract: Saint Paul Public Library (SPPL) co-created  culturally responsive and informed programs, resources, and services to support some of the most marginalized members of the community—immigrants and refugees from the Karen, Somali, and Latino communities —and to address inequities in library services. During the15-month grant period, Cultural Liaisons facilitated over 350 virtual and in-person programs and provided one-on-one reference services for thousands of people.
 
During the COVID-19 crisis, the Cultural Liaisons have proven to be SPPL’s most valuable, capable, and adaptive staff in the face of unprecedented facility closures because of the responsive, flexible, relationship-based approach to their work. As a snapshot, between March 21 and June 6, 2020, Somali, Latino, and Karen Liaisons provided support to over 900 households via over 1,300 interactions. Needs addressed include translating COVID-19 information; navigating applications for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, unemployment insurance benefits, MNsure health coverage, Social Security Administration and Internal Revenue Service documentation, and Section 8 housing questions; and, support for the many facets of transitioning to distance learning for K-12 students.
 


State Goal: Libraries respond to diverse community needs
Budget Information
LSTA
MATCH-State
MATCH-Other
Total
$99,829.40
$0.00
$25,100.92
$124,930.32
Intent(s)
Improve users’ ability to participate in their community.
Adult Literacy
Programming & Event Planning
Activities
Activity Details
Title: Community Conversations
Narrative:

At Rondo Community Library and other SPPL branches, East African families from the Somali community are some of the highest users of many one-to-one after-school library programming such as Homework Center Help and Reading Together. Families from all over the Twin Cities  visit the library, bringing students to meet with volunteers and work study students to help their children take advantage of the resources and learning available. Many parents (mostly moms)  waited outside of rooms as their children used the computers or read with volunteers. These parents represented a large number of regular patrons that weren’t being engaged fully.

In response  the Somali Liaison hosted  six successful Community Conversation and five Mom’s Conversations. CommunityConversations included an invitation to the Saint Paul Police DepartmentCommunity Liaison who invited parents to take courses on being communityhelpers. There was another conversation with parents on how to get them to talkto their kids more. Following conversations centered on what they want to seeoffered through the library and how we can help make it happen. Another highlyinvolved parent hosted her own separate conversations outside of staff-ledconversations. They booked the meeting rooms on their own and invited parentsto have similar conversations. This truly shows how a higher engagement of theSomali community led to them having a sense of ownership and belonging oflibrary space and resources.

 

LSTAgrant funding supported the staff capacity to host these CommunityConversations – to connect these Somali parents with relevant library servicesand to engage with them to co-create relevant services that didn’t alreadyexist. Thanks to this programming, the library became a learning for space fortheir children and for them. These Community Conversations were so impactful.



Intent: Improve users’ ability to participate in their community.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Program
Format: Combined in-person & virtual


Quantity
Session length (minutes): 0
Number of sessions in program: 60
Average number in attendance per session: 33
Number of times program administered: 11


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: Targeted
Geographic community of the targeted group: Urban
For what age groups: 26-49 years
50-59 years
For what economic types: Economic Not Applicable
For what ethnicity types: Black
Is the activity directed at families: Yes
Is the activity directed at intergenerational groups: Yes
Is the activity directed at immigrants/refugees: Yes
Is the activity directed at those with disabilities: No
Limited functional literacy or informational skills: No
Is the activity category not already captured: No


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: Hayden Heights Library
Address: 14556 White Bear Ave
City: St. Paul
State: MN
Zip: 55106
Name: Rice Street Library
Address: 1011 Rice Street
City: St Paul
State: MN
Zip: 55117
Name: Riverview Library
Address: 1 E George St.
City: St. Paul
State: MN
Zip: 55107
Name: Rondo Community Library
Address: 461 N. Dale St
City: St. Paul
State: MN
Zip: 55103
Name: Sun Ray Library
Address: 2105 Wilson Ave
City: St. Paul
State: MN
Zip: 55119
Question 1: I learned something by participating in this library activity.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I feel more confident about what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I intend to apply what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 4: I am more aware of resources and services provided by the library.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 5: I am more likely to use other library resources and services.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Karen embroidery and Karen, Spanish and Somali computer classes
Narrative:

There is a growing Latinx community in St. Paul but not  in library spaces. Staff ability to work with patrons and build trusting relationships increased patrons’ access to technology and use of library spaces.


The Latinx Liaison hosted computer classes twice a week in partnership with CLUES.  Patrons from the computer classes at CLUES who had never come into library spaces began to regularly use Rondo Community Library’s OpenLab to work on typing, other digital literacy skills and to apply for jobs and  social services.

 

Although in-person classes were suspended in March 2020 due to the pandemic they resumed virtually in mid-April. When classes resumed remotely, patrons were taught everything from how to turn on a computer to navigating communication from clinics regarding COVID-19, sync emails on phones to laptops and desktops, reset passwords and much more. The bi-lingual assistance has been vital to many patrons and families when they couldn’t come into library and community partner spaces withtheir concerns and questions.


Remarkably, the number of families and patronswith pre and post pandemic did not alter; a significant number of patrons continue to come for help virtually through WhatsApp, phone calls and video-calling. Once assisted, patrons pass on their knowledge to the next person, becoming a resource themselves for their community.

 

Karen Liaisons also hosted virtual digital literacy classes in the summer. Initially, Karen Liaisons were concerned Karen households would have challenges navigating remote programming. And, while they were right, the Karen Liaisons with great time and efforts were able to fairly quickly work with families to make remote program engagement possible. The Liaisons work has opened the door for patrons to learn more; these families have been eager to access more resources online. Progress has been tremendous and the Liaisons now co-create programming to meet these newly identified needs and interests.

  

When libraries closed, the liaisons quickly pivoted from how they previously delivered in-person service to best fit what families and patrons had at their disposal. There was no longer a physical community space but the liaisons created a strong and powerful virtual community space during virtual learning and computer class programming.



Intent: Improve users’ ability to participate in their community.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Program
Format: Combined in-person & virtual


Quantity
Session length (minutes): 90
Number of sessions in program: 0
Average number in attendance per session: 8
Number of times program administered: 154


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: Targeted
Geographic community of the targeted group: Urban
For what age groups: 18-25 years
26-49 years
50-59 years
60-69 years
For what economic types: Economic Not Applicable
For what ethnicity types: Asian
Hispanic
Is the activity directed at families: No
Is the activity directed at intergenerational groups: Yes
Is the activity directed at immigrants/refugees: Yes
Is the activity directed at those with disabilities: No
Limited functional literacy or informational skills: Yes
Is the activity category not already captured: No


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: CLUES
Address: asfdsdf
City: St Paul
State: MN
Zip: 551-7
Question 1: I learned something by participating in this library activity.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I feel more confident about what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I intend to apply what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 4: I am more aware of resources and services provided by the library.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 5: I am more likely to use other library resources and services.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Summer language programs
Narrative:

Atthe onset of the pandemic, St. Paul Public Library suspended all in-personlibrary programming.

TheCommunity Services program pivoted the HOW to still connect with the targetaudience -- Karen families – and engage them in hands-on learning and literacyover the summer. The Karen Liaisons served patrons at a new Bookmobile stopfrom June – September 2020. The Bookmobile stop was on the east side of St.Paul where a majority Karen population lives. This apartment complex is noteasily accessible to grocery stores, libraries, non-profits or publictransportation. Many families that visited had never used the Bookmobile or alibrary before. Some of the elementary-age children, however, were familiarwith the Bookmobile because the Bookmobile had visited their schools.

Duringthe stops, SPPL staff distributed free-to-keep Summer Spark books, assortedsupplies like crayons, markers, colored pencils and take-and-make activitykits. Liaisons also made sure to have specific print-outs in Karen for familiesto practice and learn the Karen script. Families and parents also came withgeneral reference questions for staff. In September liaisons brought laptopsand helped patrons apply for chrome books through Minnesota AfterschoolAdvance. At least 4 families received chrome books because of these efforts!

Thereliable and regularly scheduled stop became something patrons depended on asstaff were able to address social, literacy and technology needs. We usingmasks and hand sanitizer as well as keeping social distance between familygroups. We shared books and basic art and writing supplies. The Bookmobile hadWiFi available and staff helped patrons troubleshoot technology issues.



Intent: Improve users’ ability to participate in their community.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Program
Format: Combined in-person & virtual


Quantity
Session length (minutes): 90
Number of sessions in program: 0
Average number in attendance per session: 80
Number of times program administered: 15


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: Targeted
Geographic community of the targeted group: Urban
For what age groups: All Ages
For what economic types: Economic Not Applicable
For what ethnicity types: Asian
Is the activity directed at families: No
Is the activity directed at intergenerational groups: Yes
Is the activity directed at immigrants/refugees: Yes
Is the activity directed at those with disabilities: No
Limited functional literacy or informational skills: Yes
Is the activity category not already captured: No


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 1
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 1
Question 1: I learned something by participating in this library activity.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I feel more confident about what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I intend to apply what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 4: I am more aware of resources and services provided by the library.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 5: I am more likely to use other library resources and services.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Family STEM programs
Narrative:

Librarystaff created STEM kits to distribute to youth and families in the Summer of2020. Kits included instructions and materials to create Oobleck Slime andBubble Lamps. At the Karen bookmobile stop, young patrons picking up the kitswere given a how-to demonstration. Two hundred and fifty three kits werecreated and distributed to families and youth at all bookmobile stops. Familiesserved through remote programming would drive to meet with the Liaisons at thissite to pick up learning materials or to follow-up on a previous lesson.

Theneeds and interests of the families informed staff about what materials,resources and programming would have the most impact and breadth. Staff wereable to successfully connect patrons to relevant materials and resources that they needed andsparked curiosity in learning more about the Library. 



Intent: Improve users’ ability to participate in their community.

Activity: Content
Mode: Creation
Format: Physical


Quantity
Number of items digitized: 0
Number of items digitized and available to the public: 0
Number of physical items: 0
Number of open-source applications/software/systems: 0
Number of proprietary applications/software/systems: 0
Number of learning resources (e.g. toolkits, guides): 100
Number of plans/frameworks: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: Targeted
Geographic community of the targeted group: Urban
For what age groups: 6-12 years
13-17 years
For what economic types: Economic Not Applicable
For what ethnicity types: Asian
Is the activity directed at families: Yes
Is the activity directed at intergenerational groups: No
Is the activity directed at immigrants/refugees: Yes
Is the activity directed at those with disabilities: No
Limited functional literacy or informational skills: No
Is the activity category not already captured: No


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 1
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 1

Activity Details
Title: Storytimes
Narrative:

KarenLiaisons prioritized creating high quality storytimes and literacy opportunitiesfor Karen families. These have been well-attended and are hugely popular. Totruly highlight the impact of their work during the pandemic, the numbers fromMarch 2020 – September 2020 compared to previous in-person programming actually increased by an average of 1.5attendees. Transportation and access to libraries had been a persistent issueand virtual programming allowed patrons who may not have been able to get tolibraries before, an opportunity to participate remotely.

Bythe last weekend of March, the liaisons began remote Storytime programming forfamilies. Students who had not seen their friends for weeks were excited tomeet virtually. The practice of meeting virtually set families up for asuccessful transition to remote learning when school resumed in the followingweeks. The popularity and success of remote Storytime grew by word of mouth,but liaisons had to cap the number of attendees due to the challenge ofonboarding families to remote meetings, technology troubleshooting, teaching participantsand caregivers remote meeting best practices and limiting attendees to amanageable level.

Thisgrant allowed the liaisons to increase their capacity to reaching out to morepatrons and families. The relationships and connections staff have been able tomake with patrons from this community has increased our learning andunderstanding of how to better support and reach families who need ourresources most as well as increasing our ideas of what library work and libraryspaces could look like. In-person programming is relevant – and so is virtualprogramming. Working with families and the community despite the pandemic hashighlighted how readily and fastidiously liaisons can pivot to continue toserve and meet the needs of our patrons in remote and borderless libraryspaces.

 



Intent: Improve users’ ability to participate in their community.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Program
Format: Combined in-person & virtual


Quantity
Session length (minutes): 30
Number of sessions in program: 0
Average number in attendance per session: 172
Number of times program administered: 14


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: Targeted
Geographic community of the targeted group: Urban
For what age groups: 0-5 years
6-12 years
For what economic types: Economic Not Applicable
For what ethnicity types: Asian
Is the activity directed at families: Yes
Is the activity directed at intergenerational groups: No
Is the activity directed at immigrants/refugees: Yes
Is the activity directed at those with disabilities: No
Limited functional literacy or informational skills: No
Is the activity category not already captured: No


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 1
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Question 1: I learned something by participating in this library activity.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I feel more confident about what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I intend to apply what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 4: I am more aware of resources and services provided by the library.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 5: I am more likely to use other library resources and services.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Project Outcomes
Project Outcomes
List any important outcomes or findings not previously reported:
SPPL staff across the system are engaged and interested in the work of community services and the cultural liaison approach. In recognition of this work, SPPL was awarded IMLS CARES funding for FY2021Community Services program: staff time, evaluation, staff technology, and Wi-Fi hot spots.
Please briefly describe the importance of these outcomes and findings for future program planning:
We are awaiting final evaluation results from Wilder Research to inform potential Community Services program changes overall and to adjust current and future public programming. (Preliminary and draft reports are attached.)
Explain one or two of the most significant lessons learned for others wanting to adopt any facets of this project:
Investing in the culture-first approach to library work has ensured that some of St. Paul’s most vulnerable populations have been able to continue to benefit from the library’s free-to-use programs, resources, and services. Cultural Liaisons have proven to among SPPL’s most valuable, capable, and adaptive staff in the face of unprecedented facility closures. The Cultural Liaisons were able to immediately pivot because their approach is responsive, flexible, and intentionally not rooted in one branch or during specific desk hours. In fact, early on, they were receiving cell phone calls (a primary mode of service) from patrons who did not even know the facilities were closed! In addition to programming Cultural Liaisons provide individualized and labor-intensive, one-on-one, remote support for community members. Topics include translating COVID-19 information; navigating applications for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, unemployment insurance benefits, MNsure health coverage, Social Security Administration and Internal Revenue Service documentation, Saint Paul Bridge Fund applications, and Section 8 housing questions; and, support for the many facets of transitioning to distance learning for K-12 students, including resourcing Wi-Fi hotspots and other sources of broadband. When explaining documents, policies, new and emerging CDC guidelines, COVID-related resources, concerns, and fears, there is much care given to language and cultural context as well as sensitivity to dire social consequences, like public charge ground of inadmissibility and deportation. A key learning from this grant is the value of investing in ongoing program design and evaluation. The practice of data collection has been integrated into the Cultural Liaisons mode of working, and our partnership with Wilder Research, both building the logic model and facilitating surveys and focus groups, has been essential to effectively communicating the impact of this program model to stakeholders, including to IMLS. One IMLS reviewer commented, “The section on project results is particularly strong and could inform the work of other libraries looking to measure the success of their efforts to engage diverse population groups.” With that said, developing a culture of impact through integrating evaluation practices is an iterative, learning process. Collecting data can be tedious and time-consuming, especially without a clear system for managing data and clarity about which metrics really “matter.” In 2021, as part of the IMLS grant, SPPL will again with work with Wilder Research, this time with a plan to create a standard data tracking tool, ensuring that when Community Services team members are investing time in impact reporting, it’s not to track everything but to track the metrics that support evaluation against the logic model, which is to say, to track the data that demonstrates how and why this work meets the information and literacy needs of and impacts the lives of community members.
Do you anticipate continuing this project after the current reporting period ends:
Yes
Do you anticipate any change in level of effort in managing this project:
No
Explain:

Do you anticipate changing the types of activities and objectives addressed by the project:
No
Explain:

Was an evaluation conducted for this project:
Yes
Was a final written evaluation report produced:
Yes
Can the final written evaluation report be shared publicly on the IMLS website:
Yes
Was the evaluation conducted by project staff (either SLAA or local library) or by a third-party evaluator:
Third-Party
What data collection tools were used for any report outcomes and outputs:
Administrative Records
Review Surveys
Focus Groups
Participant Observation
Did you collect any media for the data:
What types of methods were used to analyze collected data:
Statistical Methods
Qualitative Methods
Other:
How were participants (or items) selected:
Word of mouth – We asked participants to tell their community/friends/family and encourage them to participate.
What type of research design did you use to compare the value for any reported output or outcome:
No comparison for any reported output or outcome: This evaluation used the library's strategic plan as guiding principles and measured progress towards those.
Exemplary: No
Exemplary Narrative
Project Tags: