View Project

G2S Project Code: 2017-MN-79840
State: Minnesota
Fiscal Year: 2017
Grantee
State Library Services - Minnesota Department of Education

Project Director
Director Name: Jennifer R. Nelson
Director Phone: 651-582-8791
Director Email: jennifer.r.nelson@state.mn.us
General Information
Title: Improving Library Services to Children and Youth
State Project Code:
Start Date: 10/01/2017
End Date: 09/30/2018
Abstract:

State Library Services invested in activities intended to improve public and school library services for children and youth from birth through high school graduation. Our efforts enabled libraries to align their services and efforts to statewide priorities and identified needs, including reducing the achievement gap, supporting student literacy and school engagement, and preparing all youth for success in college and career. We provided high-quality professional development opportunities and resources that increased knowledge, skills, and resources for early literacy. Our efforts to create connections for public libraries, schools, and school libraries strengthened supports for students and generated new opportunities for engagement.



State Goal: Increase access to library resources
Budget Information
LSTA
MATCH-State
MATCH-Other
Total
$133,321.53
$81,108.50
$0.00
$214,430.03
Intent(s)
Improve users' general knowledge and skills.
Education
Early Literacy
Activities
Activity Details
Title: Enriching Minds and Bodies
Narrative:

Our efforts centered on growing a network of local support for students by connecting school and public libraries. In bringing the 90-Second Newbery Film Festival, a national student competition, to Minnesota. We supported school and public librarians and teachers in working with students on projects that used and expanded 21st century skills. We brought 90-Second Newbery founder and middle-grade author James Kennedy to Minnesota to visit several schools and classrooms. We brought Mr. Kennedy to Minnesota to host the screening of submissions from Minnesota and across the country. We worked with the State Visual & Media Arts Education Coordinator, based at the Perpich Center for Arts Education, as well as a Literacy Specialist at the Minnesota Department of Education in order to ensure the project’s connection to state academic standards, and to spread the word about the competition.


State Library Services partnered with other Minnesota Department of Education divisions to further support student success. In partnership with the Food and Nutrition Services division, we held a webinar and informational sessions to help libraries serve as and/or partner with summer or after school food sites. Through this and other efforts, we helped to grow the number of summer food and after school snack sites in Minnesota libraries from 15 in summer 2017 to 22 in summer 2018. We also worked with MDE’s Expanded Learning Education Specialist to create stronger connections between 21st Century Community Learning Center afterschool programs and libraries.






Intent: Improve users' general knowledge and skills.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Presentation/performance
Format: Combined in-person & virtual


Quantity
Presentation/performance length (minutes): 60
Number of presentations/performances administered: 14
Average number in attendance per session: 32


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 140
Academic Libraries: 108
SLAA: 1
Consortia: 17
Special Libraries: 127
School Libraries: 958
Other: 0

Activity Details
Title: Connecting with Schools
Narrative:


State Library Services brought three Minnesota writers into three public schools for writing residencies with middle school students. Through this project, 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students had the opportunity to improve their creative writing skills by working closely with a professional writer. Slam poet Guante visited Olson Middle School in Minneapolis for three half-days, giving the students a crash course in performance poetry writing. Middle grade author Kurtis Scaletta visited Kenwood Middle School in Lakeville for three one-hour writing workshops. And, finally Newbery Honor-winning author Margi Preus spent a three-day residency at Bemidji Middle School, sharing writing tips with 7th and 8th graders. The writers were thrilled to be in the classrooms, and the teachers and students appreciated the opportunity to connect in small groups with the talented and accessible professional writers.



The Libraries Serving Youth Meetup forum to brought together school and public librarians in order to build relationships focused on improving the capacity to collaborate. A presentation featured four projects between four different school districts and library systems, including a school district and library system issuing students joint library cards. The Meetup enabled conversations and idea-sharing about partnerships between school and public libraries







Intent: Improve users' general knowledge and skills.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Program
Format: In-person


Quantity
Session length (minutes): 147
Number of sessions in program: 3
Average number in attendance per session: 40
Number of times program administered: 4


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: Targeted
Geographic community of the targeted group: Urban
Suburban
Rural
For what age groups: 0-5 years
6-12 years
13-17 years
For what economic types: Economic Not Applicable
For what ethnicity types: Indian
Asian
Black
Hispanic
Pacific
Is the activity directed at families: No
Is the activity directed at intergenerational groups: No
Is the activity directed at immigrants/refugees: No
Is the activity directed at those with disabilities: No
Limited functional literacy or informational skills: No
Is the activity category not already captured: No


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 140
Academic Libraries: 108
SLAA: 1
Consortia: 17
Special Libraries: 127
School Libraries: 958
Other: 0
Question 1: I learned something by participating in this library activity.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I feel more confident about what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I intend to apply what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 4: I am more aware of resources and services provided by the library.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 5: I am more likely to use other library resources and services.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Increasing the Quality of Early Literacy Activities
Narrative:

State Library Services supported Minnesota library staff in offering high quality early learning opportunities to their communities.

We printed and distributed “Talk, Sing, Read, Write, Play…Everyday” bookmarks and posters, that offer information on how the five early literacy practices of Every ChildReady to Read (ECRR) as defined by the Public Library Association help children to develop pre-reading skills and meet Minnesota’s Early Childhood Indicators of Progress (ECIPs). The bookmarks and posters are available in six languages. We distributed more than 28,000 bookmarks and nearly 400 posters to schools, libraries, and early learning organizations across Minnesota from October 2017 through September 2018.

 

We teamed up with the Minnesota Department of Education’s Early Learning and Communications divisions to create early STEM learning bookmarks. The bookmarks reflect the look of the early literacy bookmarks. With a sealife theme, the bookmarks share with parents and caregivers five basic STEM practices: Read,Count, Observe, Predict, Build—mirroring the five ECRR early literacy practices. The reverse of the bookmark highlights developmental STEM benchmarks children will likely reach from ages one to five if parents/caregivers engage in the proscribed practices with them. Minnesota’s Early Childhood Indicators of Progress, the state’s early learning standards, are the source of the listed benchmarks.

 

Minnesota partnered with OCLC Webjunction in Supercharged Storytimes for All, an IMLS grant-funded project. We recruited staff statewide  to be trained by OCLC in Supercharged Storytimes curriculum and to share their knowledge and create/moderate a community of practice among storytimeproviders. Supercharged Storytimes for All provided free and widely available training for library storytime practitioners on how to intentionally apply research-based practices to build early literacy in young children attending library storytimes.

Intent: Improve users' general knowledge and skills.

Activity: Instruction
Mode: Program
Format: Combined in-person & virtual


Quantity
Session length (minutes): 240
Number of sessions in program: 6
Average number in attendance per session: 5
Number of times program administered: 1


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 140
Academic Libraries: 108
SLAA: 1
Consortia: 17
Special Libraries: 127
School Libraries: 958
Other: 0
Question 1: I learned something by participating in this library activity.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I feel more confident about what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I intend to apply what I just learned.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 4: Applying what I learned will help improve library services to the public.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Project Outcomes
Project Outcomes
List any important outcomes or findings not previously reported:
State Library Services took a multi-faceted approach to tracking and measuring outcomes. Projects were evaluated on a program-by- program basis, with varying methods of assessment based on the nature of the program. Librarians who attended the Libraries Serving Youth Meetup reported through post-event surveys their appreciation for this venue for connection between school and public librarians. Participants cited exposure to new ideas and connecting to library support networks as benefits of attending the Meetup. Through participant observation and interpersonal interaction, State Library Services staff gauged a high level of satisfaction with the 90-Second Newbery Festival. The screening was appreciated for the way it featured the student filmmakers’ creative work.
Please briefly describe the importance of these outcomes and findings for future program planning:
The overwhelmingly positive response from stakeholders and program participants provides assurance that a focus on youth services is appreciated and valuable. Through aligning our goals with the Minnesota Department of Education’s vision and initiatives, we support and encourage Minnesota libraries in serving youth.
Explain one or two of the most significant lessons learned for others wanting to adopt any facets of this project:
We recognized the importance in listening when an idea is brought to us, as well as ensuring we are approachable so those ideas can and will be shared. Many of the projects we implemented with LSTA funds were either proposed or inspired by librarians and educators who work directly with children and families every day. Without their input and willingness to bring an idea to us, we may not have recognized the need for such projects. We are stronger when we are open to new ideas and ways of doing.
Do you anticipate continuing this project after the current reporting period ends:
Yes
Do you anticipate any change in level of effort in managing this project:
No
Explain:

Do you anticipate changing the types of activities and objectives addressed by the project:
No
Explain:

Was an evaluation conducted for this project:
No
Was a final written evaluation report produced:
No
Can the final written evaluation report be shared publicly on the IMLS website:
No
Was the evaluation conducted by project staff (either SLAA or local library) or by a third-party evaluator:
Third-Party
What data collection tools were used for any report outcomes and outputs:
Did you collect any media for the data:
What types of methods were used to analyze collected data:
Other:
How were participants (or items) selected:
What type of research design did you use to compare the value for any reported output or outcome:
Exemplary: No
Exemplary Narrative
Project Tags: summer meals, student success, early literacy