View Project

G2S Project Code: 2017-GA-79768
State: Georgia
Fiscal Year: 2017
Grantee
Georgia Public Library Service

Project Director
Director Name: Emily Almond
Director Phone: 404 235-7141
Director Email: ealmond@georgialibraries.org
General Information
Title: IT Support – Internal and External
State Project Code: GA0023-2015
Start Date: 10/01/2016
End Date: 09/30/2018
Abstract:

We provide IT support both internally for GPLS and externally for Georgia’s public libraries. We provide internal desktop support, email, web hosting and maintenance of a file server as well as information security. Externally, support takes the form of Google Chrome and GSuite hosting, enrollment and management, Google for Work for library staff, content creation and management of galibtech.georgialibraries.org, a clearinghouse for use by all libraries, and by the management of a $2.3 million technology grant.


Project Outcomes

List any important findings or outcomes from your project: 

•The Google for Work Project was launched, wherein we are migrating Georgia’s libraries from their currently hosted email solutions to the GSuite cloud application. The new suite of products available include:

  • Gmail

  • Hangouts

  • Calendar

  • Google plus

  • Google Drive cloud storage

  • Google productivity suite

  • Docs

  • Sheets

  • Slides

  • Forms

  • Sites

  • •Launched Google Apps Academy site, including materials and documentation for Georgia libraries:

  • Learn all about Google applications

  • Devices

  • Training Videos

  • FAQs

  • Security Checklist

  • Migration Manuals


•53 library systems are currently deploying over 2,426 Google Chrome boxes, Chrome books and tablets, bringing the number of computers in Georgia’s libraries to 7,000+.

•Types of Operating Systems deployed:

  • Computer lab machines for adult use

  • Computer lab machines for teen use

  • Computer lab machines for children’s use

  • OPAC’s

  • OPAC’s for children’s use

  • Genealogy stations

  • Digital signage

  • General Information stations

  • Loaner devices

  • Mobile programming kits

  • Testing/Training stations


•The IT team conducted an overhaul of the galibtech site, utilizing Google Sites. It began as an  information clearinghouse for IT administrators in Georgia’s public libraries. It remains a resource for use by IT professionals from our libraries to share experiences and ideas and to explore opportunities made possible by emerging technologies. 


•The MRR Grant Management program was re-branded the “LibTech Fund.” We experienced a transition in the IT Program Manager position responsible for the program. In addition, funding guidelines were changed during the reimbursement phase causing some disruption of service to the libraries. $867,395.81 of FY2018 funds were rolled over to the FY2019 funding year.



Please briefly describe importance of findings. 

•Migrating Georgia’s libraries to GSuite takes, on average 4 weeks at a time, 4 systems at a time. The majority of that time is training and communications. Progress thus far:

773 statewide accounts

240+ mailing lists

18 domains migrated

4 domains in progress at a pace of 1/week and 4/month

•We have migrated 3 library systems that were not previously hosted by GPLS 

•12 applications in the productivity suite

•3 GSuite training sessions

•7 presentations

•60 pages of material on Apps Academy

oTraffic:

55 users

95 sessions

390 page views

26% returning users


•Phase II of project continuing the support of deployment of Google Chrome Boxes and Chrome Books for public access machines and for mobile labs in libraries.

•For cost of less than $170 per machine, utilizing the Google Chrome box with the Google apps environment, there is the potential to replace the following list of individual software licenses for which libraries currently pay:

oMicrosoft Office

oDeep Freeze

oEmail 

oTime management

oSurvey Monkey

oWebex

oChat



•The LibTech Fund program changes resulted in restrictions placed on allowable items. GPLS IT staff worked with libraries to either change purchasing plans, offset rejected items, or to reimburse libraries for the amounts not covered by the funds. The investment in Makerspace technologies subsequently dropped 90% in FY2018 from the previous year.

  • The galibtech.georgialibraries.org site has a healthy traffic flow:

  • 123 new pages on site

  • 600 users/month

  • 836 individual sessions

  • 1,841 page views

  • 22% page views are returning visitors



What methods did you use to determine your findings? Check all that apply.

Survey

Review of Administrative Data

Interview/Focus Group

Participant Observation 

 Other – Anecdotal Feedback


Based on outputs, outcomes and/or other results, explain any significant lessons learned from these findings for either the SLAA or others in the LIS field.

•As each stage of Chrome books and boxes rolls out, we are more convinced each time that cloud computing is the most efficient and scalable solution for public access computing in libraries.



State Goal: Ensuring equal access to information and technology
Budget Information
LSTA
MATCH-State
MATCH-Other
Total
$517,865.49
$320,186.00
$0.00
$838,051.49
Intent(s)
Improve library's physical and technology infrastructure.
Library Infrastructure & Capacity
Systems & Technologies
Activities
Activity Details
Title: GSuite for Libraries
Narrative:

The Google for Work Project was launched, wherein we are migrating Georgia’s libraries from their currently hosted email solutions to the GSuite cloud application. If GPLS was hosting their current email system, they have been/are in the process of migrating to GSuite. If they are externally hosted, they have the option to be hosted by GPLS and be migrated to GSuite.


Intent: Improve library's physical and technology infrastructure.

Activity: Content
Mode: Other
Format: Digital
Other: Support for Google for Work


Quantity


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: Georgia Public Library Service
Address: 1800 Century Place NE
City: Atlanta
State: GA
Zip: 30345
Question 1: I am satisfied that the resource is meeting library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: Applying the resource will help improve library services to the public.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: IT Help Desk and Support
Narrative:

The goal is to provide staffed Help Desk for library technology support and PINES support; provide software development, system administration and IT statewide training; supply the necessary IT expertise to assist local library systems with technological issues.

To support the network infrastructure and day to day Information Technology support of GLASS and GDC. 

 

IT Support

       Mailboxes on hosted GA libraries' hosted email server: 2100 

       Number of library systems directly served by hosted email service: 45

       Number of library systems directly served by hosted web service: 32

       Number of web sites hosted for other library organizations: 4

       Number of lists on mailing list server: 61

       Number of libraries for which public DNS hosted:45

       Number of libraries directly supported: 2 (GPLS & GLASS)

       Number of GPLS offices served: 3


Intent: Improve library's physical and technology infrastructure.

Activity: Content
Mode: Other
Format: Combined physical & digital
Other: IT support


Quantity


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 406
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Question 1: I am satisfied that the resource is meeting library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: Applying the resource will help improve library services to the public.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: galibtech.org
Narrative:

The IT team conducted an overhaul of the galibtech site, utilizing Google Sites. It began as an  information clearinghouse for IT administrators in Georgia’s public libraries. It remains a resource for use by IT professionals from our libraries to share experiences and ideas and to explore opportunities made possible by emerging technologies. 

Our goal for the re-architecture was to keep it simple: landing pages for each major project, clear menu items and straightforward navigation throughout.


Project Activities


Google Chrome Management

•Revamp of galibtech.georgialibraries.org

o5 new pages of content

•8 virtual library trainings on ChromeOS

•1 in-person training on ChromeOS at Technology Boot Camp (108 attendees)

•54 users joined new Chrome discussion group


GSuite for Libraries

•Survey results:

o98% of users said they had enough training to use G Suite effectively

o100% of users said they had enough support

o60% of users are participating in online training during migration


Google for Work Project/GPLS

•52 GPLS staff enrolled in the Google for Work productivity suite

•13 applications available

•Unlimited cloud storage utilizing Google Drive

•As a result of adoption, phased out Windows server

•As a result of adoption, reduced reliance on external contractors for support

•In process of evaluating phasing out other productivity tools currently in use by agency




LibTech Fund (formerly MRR Grant) Management

•$2,322,604

•63 library systems receiving an allocation of the funds

oMakerspace Technology: $62,801

oNetwork Hardware: $170,643

oPublic Access Computing: $2,089,159

•Number of Items

oMakerspace Technology: 193

oNetwork Hardware: 522

oPublic Access Computing: 6,604

•Revamp of galibtech.georgialibraries.org

o5 new pages of content


IT Support

•GPLS IT 595 Tickets:

•Number of libraries directly supported: 3 (GPLS, GLASS & GDC)

•Number of GPLS offices served: 3

•GPLS Internal

oClairmont location: 198

oGLASS: 46

oGDC: 6

•External to Libraries

oIT Support: 29

oChromeOS: 46

oDNS changes: 12

oHosted email – legacy: 143

oLoaner Kits: 3

oGSuite: 4



http://galibtech.georgialibraries.org


•123 new pages on site

•600 users/month

•836 individual sessions

•1,841 page views

•22% page views are returning visitors


Project Tags:

•Emerging technologies

•Cloud Computing

•Public Access Computing




Intent: Improve library's physical and technology infrastructure.

Activity: Content
Mode: Creation
Format: Digital


Quantity
Number of items digitized: 0
Number of items digitized and available to the public: 0
Number of physical items: 0
Number of open-source applications/software/systems: 0
Number of proprietary applications/software/systems: 0
Number of learning resources (e.g. toolkits, guides): 23
Number of plans/frameworks: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 406
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Question 1: I am satisfied that the resource is meeting library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: Applying the resource will help improve library services to the public.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Technology Loaner Kits
Narrative:

The Technology LoanerKits were created in an effort to provide libraries with an avenue where theycan become familiar with new technology devices without having to purchasethem.  The kits can be used for both staff and patron training. We havetwo main goals for this project. The first it is to implement programs tolibrary patrons concerning new and innovative technology. Secondly, it is toassist library staff in recognizing new innovative devices, what they do, howto use them, and feel comfortable explaining these uses to library patrons.

Technology Loaner Kits

       Original Loaner Kit:

o   Asus Memo

o   Chromecast

o   Chromebook

o   Chromebox

o   DIY Meeting Rooms

o   NFC Rings and tags

o   PfSense Firewalls

o   IP Cam

o   Makey Makey

o   Mobile Wireless Hotspot

o   Raspberry Pi

o   iPad

o   Nexus 7/9

o   nComputing box

o   Wireless router

o   Win 10 tablet

o   Cardboard VR

o   LittleBits

o   iSense 3d scanner

o   Square reader

o   USB charge station

o   Intel Compute Stick

o   Wireless Charger

o   Playaway Launchpad

o   Chromebit

o   Cubelet

       Streetview Kit

o   Richo Theta

o   Nexus 7

o   Foldable monopod with base

       3D Printer

o   Afinia 3D Printer

o   3D Pen

o   Filament


Intent: Improve library's physical and technology infrastructure.

Activity: Content
Mode: Lending
Format: Digital


Quantity
Total number of items circulated: 37
Average number of items circulated / month: 3
Total number of ILL transactions: 0
Average number of ILL transactions / month: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 406
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Question 1: I am satisfied that the resource is meeting library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: Applying the resource will help improve library services to the public.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: Google Chrome Management
Narrative:

Continuing Phase II of project continuing the use of Google ChromeBoxes and Chrome Books for public access machines and for mobile labs inlibraries. The goal is to continue to promote and support the continuing use ofGoogle Chrome Boxes and Chrome Books as public access machines and for mobilelabs in libraries.

Project Activities Comments

       1,540 public access machines hosted

       39 library systems

       Instructions for enrollment and management ofmachines in galibtech.org

o   Google Webcast

o   FAQ

o   Chromebox Settings

o   Printer Settings


Intent: Improve library's physical and technology infrastructure.

Activity: Planning & Evaluation
Mode: Prospective
Format: In-house


Quantity
Number of evaluations and/or plans funded: 1
Number of funded evaluation and/or plans completed: 1


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 406
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Question 1: I believe the planning and evaluation addresses library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 2: I am satisfied with the extent to which the plan or evaluation addresses library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Question 3: I believe the information from the plan or evaluation will be applied to address library needs.
Strongly Agree: 0
Agree: 0
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 0
Disagree: 0
Strongly Disagree: 0
Non-Response: 0
Activity Details
Title: LibTech Fund
Narrative: The allocation for these funds is specifically for public access computer replacement and computing infrastructure. We are interpreting this as broadly as possible to allow you maximum flexibility to address diverse needs of the libraries while staying true to legislative intent. Libraries are strongly urged to use these funds for equipment that will be used by the public, or for equipment that will provide critical infrastructure for network access and public computing. 


Project Activities Comments

       $2 million

       402 libraries

       6,700 items:

o   1,350 computers

o   969peripherals

o   803monitors

o   347 cloud computers

o   166 laptops

o   115 printers

o  38 AWE early learning machines


Intent: Improve library's physical and technology infrastructure.

Activity: Procurement
Mode:
Format:


Quantity
Number of equipment acquired: 6,700
Number of acquired equipment used: 6,700
Number of hardware items acquired: 6,700
Number of acquired hardware items used: 6,700
Number of software items acquired: 0
Number of acquired software items used: 0
Number of materials/supplies acquired: 0
Number of acquired materials/supplies used: 0


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: Yes
For a targeted group or for the general population: General


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: Yes
Specific Locations: No
Library Types
Public Libraries: 406
Academic Libraries: 0
SLAA: 0
Consortia: 0
Special Libraries: 0
School Libraries: 0
Other: 0
Project Outcomes
Project Outcomes
List any important outcomes or findings not previously reported:
One important finding in terms of the tech loaner kits is that as library staff were exposed to different technologies they became more comfortable supporting the technology for patrons. That led to patron demand, which led to library management considering the technology for Makerspace build outs.
Please briefly describe the importance of these outcomes and findings for future program planning:
A convergence in library technology in Georgia has led to a considerable increase in technology and Makerspace build outs in libraries. Between the LIBTECH funding, the immersive Technology Boot Camp and the Tech Loaner Kits, we have provided Georgia’s libraries opportunities to learn, experience and fund the emerging technology landscape across the state.
Explain one or two of the most significant lessons learned for others wanting to adopt any facets of this project:
The contents of the tech loaner kits will evolve over time –as different tech becomes antiquated, we will replace it with emerging tech in which patrons and staff would be interested. Each device comes with a charger,and each kit is housed in a ruggedized case.
Do you anticipate continuing this project after the current reporting period ends:
No
Do you anticipate any change in level of effort in managing this project:
No
Explain:

Do you anticipate changing the types of activities and objectives addressed by the project:
No
Explain:

Was an evaluation conducted for this project:
No
Was a final written evaluation report produced:
No
Can the final written evaluation report be shared publicly on the IMLS website:
No
Was the evaluation conducted by project staff (either SLAA or local library) or by a third-party evaluator:
Third-Party
What data collection tools were used for any report outcomes and outputs:
Did you collect any media for the data:
What types of methods were used to analyze collected data:
Other:
How were participants (or items) selected:
What type of research design did you use to compare the value for any reported output or outcome:
Exemplary: No
Exemplary Narrative
Project Tags: Emerging technologies; Cloud Computing; Public Access Computing