View Project

G2S Project Code: 2017-OK-79083
State: Oklahoma
Fiscal Year: 2017
Grantee
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARIES

Project Director
Director Name: Wendy Gabrielson
Director Phone: 405-522-3322
Director Email: wendy.gabrielson@libraries.ok.gov
General Information
Title: Institutions
State Project Code: 173401
Start Date: 10/01/2016
End Date: 09/30/2018
Abstract: The purpose of this LSTA grant was to provide library materials and services to the individuals incarcerated in the Oklahoma Department of Corrections (DOC) facilities.  On average, there were 1,000 individuals incarcerated at each institution.  There are few full-time library staff in any of the 14 adult prison libraries and the Department of Corrections does not allocate any funds for the libraries, despite a high demand for reading material.  It is the belief of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries (ODL) that providing funding for library books fulfills a necessary cultural and practical service to correctional institutions. Reading has a direct correlation with incarceration; a study has shown that in order to predict future growth of prisons they need to simply know the percentage of 10/11-year-olds that cannot read. Based on that number they can predict how many cells will be needed in future prisons. Reading creates a literate population and provides joy, pleasure, and education. Providing reading material for inmates enriches their lives, helps to increase literacy and improve their mental capacity. In addition, reading will help them when they are released from prison. It will increase empathy and help them to negotiate the new world in which they will be living.

Most of the individuals managing the institution libraries are not professional librarians and have no previous library experience.  They have had to rely on the ODL project lead officer to provide assistance.

State Goal: Goal 1: Information Access
Budget Information
LSTA
MATCH-State
MATCH-Other
Total
$58,257.15
$0.00
$0.00
$58,257.15
Intent(s)
Improve users’ ability to obtain and/or use information resources.
Adult Literacy
Activities
Activity Details
Title: Institution Book Purchase
Narrative: The Oklahoma Department of Libraries (ODL) utilizes the McNaughton Publishing Company purchasing plan in which 10 books per month are selected, processed and mailed directly from McNaughton to each of the 14 institutions.  There are no funds allotted to the institutional libraries for recreational reading materials, so these books are the only recreational library materials offenders have available for entertainment and information. There is a great value in reading, an opportunity to daydream, to imagine, to learn; the value of reading helps create worthwhile citizens, especially as these citizens have already found themselves in this difficult place. Reading provides escape, empathy, and hope!

This year ODL was able to provide a 1-time special order for all of the institutions. The lead officer sent 49 books to each institution giving a giant boost to their libraries. So, she was able to provide some non-fiction, biographies, and a few great books that cost more than the allotted 28.00. 

Responses include:

“I am astonished and very thankful for the 49 books we received here for our Leisure Library. Inmates love reading these current reads!”
“Thank you ever so much.”
Correctional Teacher II Mack Alford Correctional Center Oklahoma Department of Corrections:

“Thanks again for send JHCC these books. I know that the inmates will enjoy reading these new titles. This is a great selection of books.” 

Joseph Harp Correctional Center: “That was a great shipment! Thank you!!” 


Intent: Improve users’ ability to obtain and/or use information resources.

Activity: Content
Mode: Other
Format: Physical
Other: Delivery of materials for the collection


Quantity


Partner Information
Organization Type of Partner Organization(s):
Libraries: No
Historical Societies or Organizations: No
Museums: No
Archives: No
Cultural Heritage Organization Multi-type: No
Preschools: No
Schools: No
Adult Education: No
Human Service Organizations: No
Other: No


Legal Type of Partner Organization(s):
Federal Government: No
State Government: No
Local Government (excluding school districts): No
School District: No
Non-Profit: No
Private Sector: No
Tribe/Native Hawaiian Organization: No


Beneficiaries
Is the activity directed at the library workforce: No
For a targeted group or for the general population: Targeted
Geographic community of the targeted group: Urban
Suburban
Rural
For what age groups: 18-25 years
26-49 years
50-59 years
60-69 years
70+ years
For what economic types: Economic Not Applicable
For what ethnicity types: Ethnicity Not Applicable
Is the activity directed at families: No
Is the activity directed at intergenerational groups: No
Is the activity directed at immigrants/refugees: No
Is the activity directed at those with disabilities: No
Limited functional literacy or informational skills: Yes
Is the activity category not already captured: Yes: Prison Inmates


Locale
Is the activity state-wide: No
Specific Locations: Yes
Name: BILL JOHNSON CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 1856 E. FLYNN ST.
City: ALVA
State: OK
Zip: 73717
Name: DICK CONNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 129 CONNER RD
City: HOMINY
State: OK
Zip: 74035
Name: EDDIE WARRIOR CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 400 N. OAK ST.
City: TAFT
State: OK
Zip: 74525
Name: HOWARD MCLEOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 1970 E. WHIPPOORWILL LN.
City: ATOKA
State: OK
Zip: 74525
Name: JACKIE BRANNON CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 900 N. WEST ST.
City: MCALESTER
State: OK
Zip: 74502
Name: JAMES CRABTREE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 216 N. MURRAY
City: HELENA
State: OK
Zip: 73741
Name: JIM E. HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 53468 MINERAL SPRINGS RD.
City: HODGEN
State: OK
Zip: 74939
Name: JOHN LILLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: ROUTE 1, 105150 N. 3670 RD.
City: BOLEY
State: OK
Zip: 74829
Name: JOSEPH HARP CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: HWY. 39 E.
City: LEXINGTON
State: OK
Zip: 73051
Name: LEXINGTON ASSESSMENT & RECEPTION CENTER
Address: HWY 39 N.
City: LEXINGTON
State: OK
Zip: 73051
Name: MACK ALFORD CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: HIGHWAY 69 N.
City: STRINGTOWN
State: OK
Zip: 74569
Name: NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: 442586 E. 250 RD.
City: VINITA
State: OK
Zip: 74301
Name: OKLAHOMA STATE REFORMATORY
Address: 1700 E. 1ST ST.
City: GRANITE
State: OK
Zip: 73547
Name: WILLIAM S. KEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Address: ONE WILLIAM S. KEY BLVD.
City: FORT SUPPLY
State: OK
Zip: 73841
Project Outcomes
Project Outcomes
List any important outcomes or findings not previously reported:
Surveys were sent to all 14 libraries. The results of those surveys showed that library visits and circulation had increased over last year. The institution libraries averaged 1,532 visitors a month and circulated an average 922 books per month, with an average of 11,402 books this year. One hundred percent reported an increase in circulation when the new books arrived each month. Institution librarians continue to write letters of gratitude for the monthly books and they also make requests for the inmates, asking for more fantasy, sci-fi and non-fiction. There was an average of 211 requests per month for books not in the library. For these types of special orders inmates are encouraged to use the Interlibrary Loan System through Oklahoma Department of Libraries as their library allows. Most of the individuals managing the institution libraries are not professional librarians and have no previous library experience. They have had to rely on the ODL project lead officer to provide assistance. Several institutions have requested help regarding library operations. The individual in charge of the library from Oklahoma State Penitentiary (OSP) asked for assistance to design a delivery method to distribute books to maximum security and medium security inmates. The library staff from Jess Dunn Correctional Center (JDCC) has also asked for help in training staff in organization and distribution of materials. She has also asked for help to develop check out regulations for the inmates. The ODL project lead officer has assisted all institutions with these types of issues and questions. This year one institution librarian, from the John Lilley Correctional Center, received his certification through the Public Library Academy, which is a Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) project sponsored by ODL. The institutions were grateful for the books received each month and continued to send notes of gratitude. They also continued to use the Interlibrary Loan Program as an extension of their collection.
Please briefly describe the importance of these outcomes and findings for future program planning:
Additional outcomes from the surveys showed that 100% responded strongly agreed or agreed that circulation increased when new books arrived, that reading comprehension/literacy improved, that there was significant interest in new subjects, and that inmates would continue to use a library once released. One hundred percent also agreed that providing reading materials improved literacy, reduced inmate idleness and provided positive preparation for re-entry to society. Comments received included: "All of the patrons using the library stated that the use of the library had improved their vocabulary and comprehension skills." "Being able to read on a daily basis, in a quiet environment, has allowed the offenders to relax and enjoy different books and develop an interest in different authors.” "This library has helped my research into several subjects of interest." "I wish our library was open more hours a day." “It keeps me busy. It makes the time pass like no other. It keeps me out of the heat.” “Reading keeps my mental health sharp and occupied. It helps me escape from noise and chaos. It keeps me out of trouble. It is good to be able to continue learning.” “There is a lot of interest in small business and self-help books and nearly every inmate has a favorite author.”
Explain one or two of the most significant lessons learned for others wanting to adopt any facets of this project:
The subscription based model continues to be a success, allowing for a regular flow of popular books to each library. ODL orders and sends 10 books per month to each institution. Each correctional center has its own rules about items released to offenders. This year one institution stopped allowing hardback books to be checked out. The project lead officer was unable to service this particular library's needs with paperbacks, so the library was dropped from the program. It was the experience of the administering agency that purchasing books with a low threshold for physical handling was not in the best use of grant funds and did not suit the subscription model. In addition, several institutions have asked for continued help in organizing and distributing the collections. The librarian from Oklahoma State Penitentiary (OSP) has asked for assistance to devise a delivery method for distributing books to maximum security and medium security inmates. Another librarian from Jess Dunn Correctional Center has also asked for help in training staff in organization and distribution at a prison library. The Oklahoma Department of Libraries project lead officer has been assisting the institutions with these types of issues and questions. In addition, many institutions continue to ask for help with inter-library loans through ODL and for help in training new staff who will run the library and distribute books to inmates. There have also been requests for help in organizing the prison libraries and how to discard old and damaged books.
Do you anticipate continuing this project after the current reporting period ends:
Yes
Do you anticipate any change in level of effort in managing this project:
No
Explain:

Do you anticipate changing the types of activities and objectives addressed by the project:
No
Explain:

Was an evaluation conducted for this project:
No
Was a final written evaluation report produced:
No
Can the final written evaluation report be shared publicly on the IMLS website:
No
Was the evaluation conducted by project staff (either SLAA or local library) or by a third-party evaluator:
Third-Party
What data collection tools were used for any report outcomes and outputs:
Did you collect any media for the data:
What types of methods were used to analyze collected data:
Other:
How were participants (or items) selected:
What type of research design did you use to compare the value for any reported output or outcome:
Exemplary: No
Exemplary Narrative
Project Tags: Institution libraries